<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>trick77.com &#187; lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trick77.com/tag/lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trick77.com</link>
	<description>...gadgeteers at work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:09:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple adds support for Panasonic LX-3 &amp; Leica D-Lux 4 raw RW2 format</title>
		<link>http://trick77.com/2010/02/14/apple-adds-support-for-panasonic-lx-3-leica-dlux4-raw-rw2-format/</link>
		<comments>http://trick77.com/2010/02/14/apple-adds-support-for-panasonic-lx-3-leica-dlux4-raw-rw2-format/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trick77.com/?p=2066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple finally introduced support for the RW2 format from the Panasonic LX-3 and the Leica D-Lux 4 compact digital cameras in the Digital Raw Camera Compatibility 3.0 update. You may have been wondering why it has taken so long to add support for these models. The reason is that the LX-3 and the D-Lux 4 use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://trick77.com/2010/02/14/apple-adds-support-for-panasonic-lx-3-leica-dlux4-raw-rw2-format/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thread issue with Nikon Nikkor 70-200 2.8 VR II</title>
		<link>http://trick77.com/2010/01/11/thread-issue-with-nikon-nikkor-70-200-2-8-vr-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://trick77.com/2010/01/11/thread-issue-with-nikon-nikkor-70-200-2-8-vr-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon d700]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trick77.com/?p=1813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My shiny, new Nikon Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 VR II lens seems to have a damaged thread inside. The thread coating seems to be flaking (click photo below to enlarge). I&#8217;m worried that the flaking parts are going to damage the lens over time. You need to zoom to 200mm and then check the area indicated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://trick77.com/2010/01/11/thread-issue-with-nikon-nikkor-70-200-2-8-vr-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tokina AT-X 116 vs. Nikkor 14-24 on Nikon FX body</title>
		<link>http://trick77.com/2009/02/15/tokina-at-x-116-vs-nikkor-14-24-on-nikon-fx-body/</link>
		<comments>http://trick77.com/2009/02/15/tokina-at-x-116-vs-nikkor-14-24-on-nikon-fx-body/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon d700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trick77.com/?p=955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post I wrote about the possibility to use the Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX 11-16mm lens on a Nikon FX body &#8211; in FX mode. I detected some corner softness with the Tokina on my D700 so I thought it would be useful to have a direct comparison between the two lenses [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://trick77.com/2009/02/15/tokina-at-x-116-vs-nikkor-14-24-on-nikon-fx-body/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tokina AT-X 116 Pro 11-16mm DX ultra wide zoom on Nikon D700 FX body</title>
		<link>http://trick77.com/2009/02/01/tokina-atx-116-pro-dx-on-nikon-fx-body/</link>
		<comments>http://trick77.com/2009/02/01/tokina-atx-116-pro-dx-on-nikon-fx-body/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon d700]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trick77.com/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m in the middle of transitioning from my Nikon D80 DX-crop sensor DSLR to a Nikon D700 full format FX-sensor DSLR. I replaced the Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DX lens (24-300mm) with: Nikkor 24-70 AF-S f/2.8 Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 AF-S VR Nikkor TC-17E II teleconverter. I&#8217;m still getting acceptable sharpness with the 70-200 tele. Of course [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://trick77.com/2009/02/01/tokina-atx-116-pro-dx-on-nikon-fx-body/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikkor 18-200mm vs 28-80mm sharpness comparison</title>
		<link>http://trick77.com/2008/11/09/nikkor-18-200mm-vs-28-80mm-sharpness-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://trick77.com/2008/11/09/nikkor-18-200mm-vs-28-80mm-sharpness-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trick77.com/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a big fan of the Nikon Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR II AF-S lens because it&#8217;s so versatile. It&#8217;s also a great companion to my Tokina AT-X 116 ultra wide angle zoom lens. Both fit nicely into my small LowePro SlingShot camera bag and it doesn&#8217;t get too heavy. After reading Ken Rockwell&#8217;s review about [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://trick77.com/2008/11/09/nikkor-18-200mm-vs-28-80mm-sharpness-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX ultra-wide zoom</title>
		<link>http://trick77.com/2008/05/04/review-tokina-at-x-116-ultra-wide-zoom/</link>
		<comments>http://trick77.com/2008/05/04/review-tokina-at-x-116-ultra-wide-zoom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trick77.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On my last trip to NYC I noticed that my Nikkor 18-200mm (27-300mm) zoom lens wasn&#8217;t wide enough for quite a few locations. I was looking for a non-fisheye, ultra-wide lens for some time when a fellow pointed me to the brand new Tokina AT-X 11-16mm f/2.8 zoom, that&#8217;s 16-24mm on my Nikon D80. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://trick77.com/2008/05/04/review-tokina-at-x-116-ultra-wide-zoom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.343 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-05 01:25:37 -->

